or Why I’m Refusing to Add a Feature
There are some principles in the design of Pynsist which have led me to turn down potentially useful options. I’ve tried to explain them here so that I can link to this rather than summarising them each time.
- Pynsist is largely a simplifying wrapper around NSIS: it provides an easy way to do a subset of the things NSIS can do. All simplifying wrappers come under pressure from people who want to do something just outside what the wrapper currently covers: they’d love to use the wrapper, if it just had one more option. But if we keep adding options, eventually the simplifying wrapper becomes a convoluted layer of extra complexity over the original system.
- I’m very keen to keep installers as simple as possible. There are all sorts of clever things we could do at install time. But it’s much harder to write and test the NSIS install code than the Python build code, and errors when the end user installs your software are a bigger problem than errors when you build it, because you’re better able to understand and fix them. So Pynsist does as much as possible at build time so that the installer can be simple.
- Pynsist has a limited scope: it builds Windows installers for Python applications. Mostly GUI applications, but it does also have support for adding command-line tools. I don’t plan to add support for other target platforms or languages.
If you need more flexibility¶
If you want to do something which Pynsist doesn’t support, there are several ways it can still help you:
- Generate an nsi script: You can run Pynsist once with the
--no-makensisoption. In the build directory, you’ll find a file
installer.nsi, which is the script for your installer. You can modify this and run
makensis installer.nsiyourself to build the installer.
- Write a custom template: Pynsist uses Jinja templates to create the nsi script. You can write a custom template and specify it in the Build section in your config file. Custom templates can inherit from the templates in Pynsist and override blocks, so you have a lot of control over the installer this way.
- Cannibalise the code: Pull out whatever pieces are useful to you from
Pynsist and use them in your build scripts. There are the installer templates,
code to find and download wheels from PyPI, to download Python itself, to
create command-line entry points, to find
makensis.exeon Windows, and so on. You can take specific bits to reuse, or copy the whole thing and apply some changes.
These are ideas that I’ve considered and decided not to do:
- Concealing source code: I’m writing Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) and I want to help other people do the same. A core FOSS principle is that the user can inspect and understand the code they are running. I’m not interested in anything that makes that harder.
- Detecting dependencies by finding
importstatements: My experience is that this doesn’t work well. It misses dynamically loaded dependencies, and it can have false positives where a module is only needed in some situations. I think specifying all modules needed is clearer than specifying corrections to what a tool detects. I am interested in dynamically finding dependencies by running a program; see my prototype kartoffel tool if you want to investigate this.
- Single-file executables: You could probably reuse a lot of Pynsist’s code to make single-file executables. They would ‘install’ to a temporary directory and then run the application. But it’s not a feature I’m planning to include.
- MSI packages: They have some advantages, but they’re much more complicated to make than NSIS installers. I have an experiment with using WiX in a branch; feel free to use it as a starting point.
These aren’t set in stone: I’ve changed my mind before, and it could well happen again.